in an article about a memo that the left will get all huffy about, the ny times apparently believes there were only two iraqi resolutions [bugmenot login]
there were alot more, even after discounting 'extend oil-for-palace' resolutions
judgement: the ny times is stupid for not realizing they are obviously lying
it's shoddy work that leads to phony stories, phony photos, phony pundits...
i could go on, but there are too many phonies over at the NYT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment