slate's Katie Roiphe asks the question:
"Is Maureen Dowd Necessary?"
a question made moot by the NY Times itself
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(383)
-
▼
November
(55)
- boiling down tv
- more decline of espn
- serial meddler
- you can NOT be serious
- just encouraging him
- dinosaurs to hit screens everywhere
- i'll take fx and usa, and hold the qvc
- media's iraq coverage and blow-back
- kim jong il, media critic
- the science of 'beer goggles'
- more iraq war opinion
- xbox 360 launch
- rebates galore
- polls, polls, everywhere polls
- fearless cable news prediction
- one way to get rid of inflation
- birds of a feather
- which way is the wind blowing
- no anti-us ad turned down
- way to take a stand
- oily politicking and grandstanding
- cutting off their nose to spite their face
- pot meet kettle
- i want my sat-tv
- freeh-k the 9/11 commission
- sow-ing some reality
- hypocrite michael moore
- good news/bad news for TiVo
- organized IE-switch campaign
- speaking of precious americans
- blame ebert
- shuster full of --it, AGAIN
- no laughing matter
- finally tv on demand
- hardball's david shuster is full of --it
- we had no intelligence
- terrorism as PR backfires
- able danger figure all-but-fired
- the next failure of a show
- meet the democratic candidate for president in 2032
- smurf this
- a real dangerous cia leak
- alarmists alarmingly off
- french cooking the usa
- late night wars long over
- CYA at the CIA
- TO needs a time out
- sign of progress
- the $ behind the music
- more dowdy times
- unnecessary AND irrelevant
- don't believe the hype
- destined for the bargain bin
- somebody gets a paycheck for this
- m&a trick or treat
-
▼
November
(55)
No comments:
Post a Comment